Geek

Sneaky Email Sucks

Having just hastily pulled together my last post on “Phishing” – I’ve been keeping a keen eye on my inbox for more interesting examples of evil email. A new message caught my eye – a good example of bad email – possibly evil, but sneaky at best.

Here are some key elements worth calling out:

[1] Once again, listed in my inbox the message looks innocuous enough. I recognize Reunion as Reunion.com – I’m not a member but occasionally see these types of invites, similar to other social space sites like Facebook, Linkedin, Plaxo, etc…

[2] Mozilla has protected me again – like with Mozilla Firefox screening links I click to known bad websites, Mozilla Thunderbird blocks any images from rendering – particularly from senders that are not in my address book. They give me the option of allowing this if I choose – presumably for senders I know. This is a common feature in email tools.

[3] Ah, here we see a bit more than we did in the Inbox listing [1]. Now I see a bit of trickery – Reunion Request is plain enough but now I see the local/user part of the sending email address is reun-ion.request@ and the domain portion is mutebrmodern.net. Why would anyone have to jack up the user portion of their email that way? It’d be like me being to-mba.rtel@somedomain.com. And that domain, if this is from Reunion – who the heck is mutebrmodern.net? It’s not out of the ordinary to have other domains send on your behalf, particularly if as a business you contract it, but as a user/recipient, your radar should be up at this point.

[4] Now this is really sneaky – back in the early days of email, there was only plain text formatting. Eventually HTML formatting made it to email providing a richer aesthetic appearance for content, similar to web pages. It can be useful, but some email programs can struggle with display of HTML code. At first blush it appears that something has gone wrong with my email program, Thunderbird, trying to render the message. Gosh, I am having trouble reading this message so I guess I better click the link right? More on that in a moment…

[5] Quick mention to take note of my email address in he URL/link in the message – shows me that the message is “personalized” but also a flag that I’m being tracked – when I click, someone, somewhere will know it was me.

[6] You have virus protection on your computer, right? I do. Make sure your anti-virus software scans your email, inbound and outbound. I’ve used AVG by Grisoft for several years. It is a fantastic program, and is free for individual, non-business purposes.

So back to point [4] – I’m not necessarily buying this – the error message “Having trouble viewing this message?” looks odd – not like what I’ve seen before in my email program. Now, I’m an email guy and have regularly scrutinized email as part of my job for years, so I don’t expect others to know this, but you can look at the raw source of an email to get even more insight. In Thunderbird a handy shortcut, Ctrl-U, does this. Here are some notable and telling things about this message from analyzing the raw message:

[7] Looking at the transmission details of the email recorded in the message headers, I see that the mail was delivered to my email server from yet another unknown domain, lsrree217.closerdried.net. As I said, it is not uncommon for legitimate companies to outsource delivery of email, but there is usually clear accountability and transparency in the domain names of those legitimate email service providers. I’m getting the feeling here that someone is purposely trying to not be known here.

[8] Further down in the message I see the plain text portion of the source message and my suspicions are confirmed – my email program Thunderbird didn’t have a problem showing the message and prompt me with “Having trouble view this message?” – that’s what the email author typed in – that is the message! Further review of the message source shows that this is the case in the HTML portion of the message as well. Okay, now I’m certain the sneakiness here is intentional.

[9] Here is more sneakiness/evilness – something those in the anti-spam space refer to as “hashbusting”. Sophos has a good example of it on their blog in which they describe it as “Hash busters are the seemingly random words or sentences located at the bottom of a spam message, used to try and bypass a variety of anti-spam techniques“. In the Sophos example the spammer puts the words where they are visible to he end recipient. In my case, the rendered message didn’t show this because the sender hid the random words in some HTML tags that aren’t visible.

Okay, so I’m convinced this isn’t even quasi-legit at best at this point, but I’ll bite – let’s click the link.

[10] mylife… what is that? Isn’t this supposed to be Reunion? In this case I happen to know that Reunion recently re-branded as mylife. Looking at the web address I see it starts with http://affiliates.mylife.com which is the bonafide mylife (formerly Reunion) website. Apparently Reunion has an affiliate member who advertises on their behalf, who not only uses sneaky and evil tactics, but hasn’t adjusted for the new brand!

[11] What the heck does this say? One of the things we encourage emailers and web site operators to do is to be openly transparent and accountable. Notices and disclosure in teeny type with low contrast is simply untrustworthy on the face of it. Bad job here mylife.

[12] This web page comes with a third-party seal of trust from Truste. These can be easily faked as well, but clicking on it shows it is legitimate.

[13] Again, check the website URL and validate that it makes sense and meets your expectation. In this case the Truste logo goes to a truste.org site and appears to make sense referencing the [14] mylife.com page we clicked from.

So, that’s a lot of analysis from one email. If anything, it exemplifies how easy it is for mailers to be sneaky in their email and how hard it is for consumes to understand what’s legit and what isn’t. In this case, Reunion appears to operate an affiliate program. That’s not uncommon for businesses on the Internet – but it take s policing – I’m betting (and hoping) that they aren’t aware of this particular affiliates behavior. I’ll pass this information along to them – in the hope that they will terminate this bad actor from their affiliate membership.

If you’ve got a good product, you shouldn’t have to trick people to come to find out more about it.

Template Update

Depending on whether you read this blog through an RSS feed aggregator or not, you may or may not have noticed the new site template. One of the things I really like about WordPress is that it is ridiculously easy to update the site template. I mentioned back in February that I migrated from Moveable Type to WordPress for what ammounted to various usability and administration issues like this.

Updating themes is easy. First you have to download a theme from somewhere. I had been browsing themes.wordpress.com, though now that I poke around, I can see that there are many other WordPress theme sites. In fact this site also has the theme I’ve just switched too, titled Amazing Grace. Once you download it, unzip it and transfer it into your WordPress wp-content folder under “themes”. Once it is there, the WordPress Administration area just recognizes it – you click it and it is applied – automagically! You can switch back and forth from one theme to another with a simple click of the mouse. When you are used to typical web design and the effort it takes to develop different look and feel – it is a fun thing to do this and see a site change instantly!

So, this Amazing Grace theme is a nice clean theme that I chose for a few reasons. One is, I like the color scheme – it is reminiscent of the colors I use on tombartel.com. I like the neutrals – grey, taupe, black, white. Good contrasts and basic. The other thing I liked was the easy modification of the Amazing Grace theme to change the pictures in the upper right of the page to be photos that I’ve taken. There are a dozen or so that are rotated randomly each time you load a page. Go ahead, refresh this page and see. See? That was a fun exercise, selecting some of my favorite photos that I’ve taken over the years. I wish there was a description or label for each, maybe a hover over description, but there isn’t. I thought about trying to hack that in. We’ll see.

So, that’s my new template with WordPress. I hope you enjoy it for now – and knowing how easy WordPress makes it to change these, look for future theme changes down the road!

Wow, Beam Me Up!

My friend David Schwartz sent this over:


Check out this insane Holographic Video Conference technology. Watch the video on the homepage.

http://www.musion.co.uk/Cisco_TelePresence.html

This is the coolest advancement of communication technology I’ve ever seen without being privy to any ‘skunkworks’ projects! This video also represents the first time that this technology has been demonstrated live.

Grabbed it off Brad Feld’s blog entry.

Just like Star Trek. KAAAAAAAAAHN!

Sorry for the blog reference to a blog reference, but hey – now you know right? The demonstration is long, and they don’t really do anything spectacular – but the holographic representation of the presenters with the live presenter is really just cool.

Check it out – very cool stuff.

The Google / Blog Internet FAQ

I love having Google around. A friend of mine works there, and we’ve spoken generally before about setting up FAQ pages for business service sites – and both sort of agreed that plain HTML files with Google search in front of it would really be just fine.

I demonstrated that twice to myself just tonight. One had to do with getting the door back on our electric range (we cleaned it). One google of “maytag range door back on” and two clicks from the second result and I’m here – a note from someone else confirming what a PITA this is going to be. We finally got it, and I believe it to be still a one-in-a-million shot, but I felt good having the confirmation from someone else in the world, that we weren’t completely on the wrong track. We will never take that door off again, BTW.

The other was that I was trying to rip some “old” CD’s of ours to put onto AJ’s new mp3 player. We really enjoy his phonetic pronunciation of some of the classic bands we have – REO Speedwagon, REM, etc… – but that’s another story. I started ripping with iTunes – which is super cinchy – there is an auto-detect when iTunes is running. Pop your CD in and it asks if you want to rip. So, I clicked. After 5 discs worth I finally tried to move them over. Crap. what is a.m4p anyway? Ugh, proprietary iTunes only to iPod formula. Darn it. I have an iPod, so that works for me, but AJ has a Sansa by SanDisk – so that was a massive wasted of time.

So to Google I go. Searched “mp3 rip free” a bit – since I’m in a time crunch and don’t want to buy something on such short notice that I haven’t fully evaluated. Some of what comes up is a bit sketchy. Then it dawns on me – the anti-Apple solution (I have a PC, BTW) – Windows Media Player!

I pop that open – and there a large glorious button right across the top, “Rip”. I try it. Error. Crap. Back to Google and search the error. The Microsoft Support site comes up, but is less than helpful.

Windows Media Player Error Message Help

You've encountered error message C00D10D2 while
using Windows Media Player. Additional information
is not currently available for this error.

Great error message. Anyway, some sub-detail here does indicate that I likely lack of an mp3 encoder available to my Windows Media Player. More quick Googling turns up this gem from Matt Read’s The Weblog. I won’t go into the details, but suffice it to say, a quick grab of this installer, provided by Justin Leoni, and in less than 2 minutes, I am happily ripping away to mp3 format.

What did we do before the Internet? Spend money with the Maytag man and listen to Vinyl, 8-tracks, and cassettes I guess. I’ll take the Internet age, thank you very much. And thank you Google!

Signature Upgrade

Check out my new signature:

You might think I’ve been practicing for a while to get this just right…

Can you imagine a room full of crumpled up paper, scattered all around, everywhere but in the circular trash bin?

Well, if you can, you’d have to imagine it somewhere else – not here. See, that’s my name, but it isn’t my signature. But, it is a signature of my name…

I ran into this site, mylivesignature.com, via lifehacker.com, and so gave it a whirl.

Kinda fun, and the result – well if you know me, not very believable. I don’t write quite this cool, and well, it is a tad bit foofy for me, though there are 120 or so other fonts to choose from.

First enter your name, choose a font, then select some size, slant, and ink characteristics, and voila, an image to be used online – like in a blog. They also provide a Word Processing document version – I haven’t tried it though.

Doesn’t seem like the site solves a major problem in people’s lives – though I did just do this the “old-fashioned” way recently for my wife, who needed her signature in a word document. I had her sign a piece of paper which I scanned and tweaked with Adobe Photoshop. Not terribly difficult, but for folks not adept at Photoshop, this is an alternative.

It’s just not really your signature, but a signature of yours.

Also, they’ll sell you an animated version of a signature you create. That (along w/ Google Adsense) explains how they keep the lights on over there. I’m impressed – pretty cool.

Give it a try! Enjoy!

RSSSubscribe to my feed now.

About Me

Not That You Asked